To find better solutions we need to *start by estimating what are the common problems*, and what the community believes should be done. For that purpose, researchers from the Center for Social Data Science at the University of Copenhagen are running a survey on the current paper-reviewer matching practices. We would love to hear from researchers at various career stages and in various roles - junior and senior, as *authors, reviewers and area chairs / action editors in the area of Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics.*
Please share your experience (good or bad) and your ideas about how things could be better! The survey is fully anonymous and takes 5-10 minutes to complete. Both the data and our analysis of it will be publicly available. The more people respond, the better information could potentially be taken into account by the future conference and workshop organizers.
- Survey for the reviewers: https://forms.office.com/r/LDtTxnQtKm
- Survey for the authors: https://forms.office.com/r/cDKba6pgQK
- Survey for the area chairs / action editors:
You are welcome to share your experience in all the roles you have performed. If you prefer to only respond once, and you have served as an area chair - this would be the most helpful, as there are fewer people in these roles.
If you have any questions about this study, please reach out to Terne Jacobsen (terne.thorn at sodas.ku.dk) or Anna Rogers (arogers at sodas.ku.dk). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/html Size: 5844 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://mailman.uib.no/public/corpora/attachments/20211124/3994b482/attachment.txt>