[Corpora-List] Looking for NLP Expert Witness for Court Experts Fees and Expenses Will be Paid

[Phil Bralich]

The plaintiff and defendants in a major NLP lawsuit are looking for Expert witnesses to testify either on the defendants' or the plaintiff's behalf concerning the B&B parser (formerly the Ergo Linguistics Parser).  

In particular, the expert needs to testify to the viability of the B&B (Ergo) parser or lack thereof and to bring evidence to bear of parallel or superior parsers, especially statistic parsers.  The expert(s)'fees will be paid, including transportation to Hawaii to testify.  The litigants and the complaint are listed below my signature line.

Inquiries, recommendations, and C.V.s should be sent to all of:

"btobin at goodsill.com" <btobin at goodsill.com>, "jdf at legalhawaii.com" <jdf at legalhawaii.com>, rshinyama at wik.com, meheula at SMLhawaii.com and "pbralich at earthlink.net" <pbralich at earthlink.net>

Philip A. Bralich, Ph.D.

LITIGANTS:

BARRY A. SULLIVAN, ESQ.; 		
MARK PIESNER; CHRIS FRY; JOHN 	
BATALI; WILLIAM O’GRADY; 		
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI’I; PETER 	
MORRELI; CRAIG WEISSMAN; SAM	 
PULLARA; SCOTT ZIEGLER; BRUCE B. 
KIM; TWITTER; ORACLE; THROWNET  
A. CA-CORP;	THROWNET B. MA-CORP
SALESFORCE.COM INC.; REGENTS OF  
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;  	
MIT’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE	 
LABORATORY; CAMBRIDGE 		
UNIVERSITY; COLUMBIA			
UNIVERSITY; UNIVERSITY OF CALIF.)
BERKELEY; XEROX PARC; 		
MICROSOFT; INFORMIX; AND 	
EARNST AND YOUNG.   

COMPLAINT (FULL COMPLAINT CAN BE VIEWED ON ACADEMIA.EDU/PHILIPBRALICH):

First Circuit Court of the First Circuit State of Hawaii
CIVIL NO. 15-1-1510-07 GWBC

                                                               (Legal Misconduct, fraud, and RICO Violations.)
)
) REFILED COMPLAINT AS PER COURT
) ORDER OF FEBRUARY 4, 2016 FOR CIVIL
) CASE NO. 15-1-1510-07 GWBC AND MOTION
) FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AGAINST 
) ALL LITIGANTS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,
) TO MOVE DIRECTLY TO TRIAL, ASKING
) RELIEF, INCLUDING MONETARY, 
) PUNITIVE, MENTAL ANGUISH, PAIN AND
) SUFFERING, AND RICO TREBLE DAMAGES
) AS ALL POSSIBLE MOTIONS TO DISMISS
) HAVE ALREADY BEEN EXHAUSTED BY
) MY REPLIES TO THE MOTIONS OF THE 
) INITIAL COMPLAINT AS REVIEWED IN 
) THIS REFILING, AND AS ANY 
) DISCOVERY BY MYSELF OR THE 
) LITIGANTS WILL ONLY SUPPORT MY 
) CASE, AND THAT IT IS MORE THAN
) ADEQUATELY CLEAR THAT I HAVE A 
) HUGE PREPONDERANCE OF THE
) EVIDENCE AS THERE HAS ONLY BEEN
) ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE AND A COMPLETE
) ABSENCE OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FROM 
) THE DEFENDANTS TO DATE, AND, IN
) ADDITION, FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST 
) BOTH BARRY A. SULLIVAN, ESQ. AND
) BRUCE B. KIM, ESQ. AS THEIR 
) EGREGIOUS ABUSES OF THE LEGAL 
) SYSTEM ARE CLEARLY EVIDENT AS 
) DESCRIBED HEREIN AND IN THE 
) ORIGINAL COMPLAINT, MOTIONS, AND
) REPLIES.