Bauer M & G Gaskell (2000) Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. London, Sage
Worth a look. Best,
________________________________ From: corpora-bounces at uib.no [corpora-bounces at uib.no] on behalf of Angus Grieve-Smith [grvsmth at panix.com] Sent: 03 February 2015 16:09 To: corpora at uib.no Subject: Re: [Corpora-List] An ignorant question concerning the basics of statistical significance > REPRESENTATIVENESS
That begs the question of what an adequate way of estimating language usage might be. Is there a way to do it at all?
If not, we should be pushing back harder on editors and reviewers who want to see p-values.
On 2/3/2015 10:52 AM, Krishnamurthy, Ramesh wrote:
As we have no adequate way of estimating language usage, and corpora are samples of language usage, is there any point in discussing 'representativeness' again?
Or has there been an advance in estimating language usage in the past 30 years that I am unaware of?
best ramesh -------- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 22:40:04 -0500 From: Angus Grieve-Smith <grvsmth at panix.com><mailto:grvsmth at panix.com> Subject: Re: [Corpora-List] An ignorant question concerning the basics
of statistical significance To: corpora at uib.no<mailto:corpora at uib.no>
I know that David Lee had problems with the representativeness of the BNC, but I believe that Tony McEnery, at least, is on the list, so he can maybe tell us more about why the BNC is representative, and of what. ...
-Angus B. Grieve-Smith
grvsmth at panix.com<mailto:grvsmth at panix.com>
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/html Size: 3396 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://mailman.uib.no/public/corpora/attachments/20150203/66b36a68/attachment.txt>