On 30 November 2012 14:41, John F Sowa <sowa at bestweb.net> wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 8:37 AM, Yuri Tambovtsev wrote:
>> English may be closer to Scandinavian languages. In fact, I applied the
>> method of Chi-square to the Germanic languages and found that Danish is
>> very close to English by the distribution of phonemes in the speech
>> sound chain.
> That qualifier "by the distribution of phonemes" is critical.
> By vocabulary, for example, French and Italian are more closely related
> than either is to the Spanish and Portuguese group. But by phonology,
> French and Italian are very different; so are Spanish and Portuguese.
> There are also questions about the core vocabulary vs. borrowings --
> such as borrowing from Italian into French or borrowing from Arabic
> into Spanish and Portuguese.
> In your analyses, do you relate the various measures of closeness
> to historical events? Geographical location? Migrations? Wars?
> For example, Galician evolved from an early version of Portuguese,
> but it has been strongly influenced by the national boundaries.
> How are the historical developments correlated with changes in
> the measures of closeness?
> UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
> Corpora mailing list
> Corpora at uib.no
-- Leon R A Derczynski NLP Research Group
Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield Regent Court, 211 Portobello Sheffield S1 4DP, UK
+45 5157 4948 http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~leon/