> > 1. "I mung headers.... I know that as a result of my munging any
> > mesasge I write will go to the list (and only to the list). And then I
> > *only* have to consider the few instances where I would need to reply
> > off list."
> I tried to find the meaning of 'mung'via google - 'mash until no good' =
> destroy? So I can't understand your use of it. If you destroy headers,
> how does that ensure you only reply to the list?
For some email consultants munging is considered bad. Chip Rosenthal wrote an essay entitled ``Munging Headers Considered Harmful'' (*) there is a copy at http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-harmful.html (or so Google tells me).
I happen to disagree vehemently with Rosenthal and his ilk. Setting Reply-To: to be the list is the only proper way to setup up a mailing list. If the owners won't do then I do with a procmail recipe.
(*) This is an in-joke for computing scientists relating back to Edsger Dijkstra's (in)famous March 1968 letter to Comm of the ACM entitled ``GOTO Considered Harmful''.
> > 2. "Except that you have actually donated your on-list replies to a
> > collection that is not under the control of the list owners. It can be
> > scrapped by anyone with a mind to. This list (and many others) is
> > being mirrored on gmane.org."
Interesting that when I searched for ``mung headers'' to find the Rosenthal paper the first thing that Google found was my post to CORPORA-L scraped to gmane.org.
> What does 'scrapped' mean in this context?
You're asking a dyslexic what a spelling means. ;-) Ah Google's define: tells me it should be ``scraped''.
Ironic isn't it that a dyslexic is passionate about corpus studies. And a dyslexic who used to work on the world's best text retrieval system (Trip originally from paralog). ;-)
> > 3. By the way, I have long been intrigued by your strapline (if that's
> > the appropriate term):
> "<>< Re: deemed!"
Interestingly in the 20+ years I've been emailing, you (Ramesh) are only the fourth or fifth person ever to comment. And of them only the second/third to ask what it means. Two replied ``me too.'' ;-)
Two parts: <>< is an ASCII art representation of the 1st century symbol ICTHUS used within the Christian church to identify themselves to other believers. One wonders what a corpus of ASCII art would look like and how would it be analysed?
``Re: deemed!'' is a pun on the word redeemed. Also makes for an interesting question of corpus analysis.
<>< Re: deemed!