Perhaps the author of the original message could clarify to prevent more chaos?
Quoting Trevor Jenkins <trevor.jenkins at suneidesis.com> on Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:23:43 +0000 (GMT):
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Vivian Tsang <vyctsang at cs.toronto.edu> wrote:
>> Shrug. I'm writing to support the argument against Rich. Patent claims
>> > have nothing to with text messaging; they're entirely different. If I
>> > asked for information about cookbooks and recipes and someone
>> steered me to
>> > their collection of movie reviews, I wouldn't find that helpful at all.
>> But the original request was for text message corpus that is *not* "a
>> collection of someone's personal (and/or family/friends') messages."
> WikiLeaks has a corpus of text messages sent over a 24 hour period on
> September 11th 2001.
>> Are text messaging ever not a collection of personal messages?
> Some of the WikiLeaks 9/11 corpus are clearly very personal. But there are
> also many texts included that are automated system status messages. The
> automated responses provide an insight into the sequence of when systems
> failed or being unusable during that day.
> Regards, Trevor
> <>< Re: deemed!
> UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
> Corpora mailing list
> Corpora at uib.no
-- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.