[Corpora-List] problems with Google counts
adam at lexmasterclass.com
Mon Mar 14 17:38:01 CET 2005
Both problem and solution are both simple (intellectually, if not
Google's goals are keeping its customers happy, and we (NLP/web
research community) are not a significant proportion of its customers,
and we are the only people who care about the accuracy of counts.
don't use Google to get web counts: set up and use a search
engine with a scientific, not a commercial, mission instead.
This is my current research agenda (see eg
) see also http://wacky.sslmit.unibo.it/
From: owner-corpora at lists.uib.no [mailto:owner-corpora at lists.uib.no] On
Behalf Of Lillian Lee
Sent: 14 March 2005 15:47
To: CORPORA at uib.no
Subject: [Corpora-List] problems with Google counts
Dear list members,
You might be interested to know that until approximately March 8th,
Google counts appear to have been quite off (inflation rates of a
factor of 66%?), according to Jean Veronis.
In a blog post of February 8th
Veronis summarized his earlier findings:
# If you type Chirac OR Sarkozy, you get half the number results of
Chirac alone, which may have a political explanation... but is a
weird approach to boolean logic.
# If you search the in the English pages, you get 1% of the number
you get for the all languages together. Does this mean that the is
99 times more frequent in languages other than English? Of course
He gave a possible explanation and noted that "if you want to know the
real index count for any word, simply type it twice".
On March 13th, he noted that the counts seem to have been adjusted,
that is "changed in a major way":
Related posts indicate problems with MSN, the possibility that Yahoo
indexes more pages than Google, and more details on calculations.
Lillian Lee, Assoc. Prof. tel: 607-255-8119
Dept of Computer Science fax: 607-255-4428
Cornell University llee at cs.cornell.edu
Ithaca, NY 14853-7501 USA www.cs.cornell.edu/home/llee
More information about the Corpora-archive